|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SKW
7-2 Metrology Guideline |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
Guideline for Optical Measurement Sites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There
are several different sampling plans to effectively characterize the
CMP process at hand with varying degrees of quality and efficiency.
Generally, we recommend that first sampling plan with three dies to
any customer who performs the measurements manually (e.g. Nanospec
Manual Optical Measurement tool).
For those using automated tools (e.g. Thermawave Opti-Probe or KLA/Tencor
UV1250, P-Series), we recommend the second sampling plan (medium quality)
with eight sites in the up and down regions measured on five dies.
We have found that this plan provides the best trade-off between quality
and efficiency (time and cost) to our customers. The remaining plan
is largely for those interested in very detailed measurements of the
wafers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manual Measurement Plan -
3 Up and 3 Down Sites on 3 Dies
Automated
Medium Quality Plan - 9 Up Sites and 8 Down Sites on 5
Dies
Automated
High Quality Plan - 22 Up Sites and 22 Down Sites on 5
Dies
PL Dedicated Plan - 12 Up Sites and 12 Down
Sites on 5 Dies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up
/ Down site (Cross Sectional View) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manual
Measurement Sampling Plan |
top |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site
Information for Manual Measurement Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Site
# |
Up
Area |
Down
Area |
Site
Density
(%) |
Pitch
(um) |
| X
(um) |
Y
(um) |
X
(um) |
Y
(um) |
| 1 |
2005 |
2000 |
2055
|
2000 |
10 |
- |
| 2 |
14045
|
6000 |
14095
|
6000 |
90 |
- |
| 3 |
14013
|
14000 |
14038
|
14000 |
50 |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
X, Y coordinates are relavant to lower left corner of each die.
* Site numbers proceed from left to right and down to up sturctures. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automated
Medium Quality Measurement Sampling Plan |
top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Locations
for Medium Quality Measurement Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Site
# |
Up
Area |
Down
Area |
Site
Density
(%) |
Pitch
(um) |
| X
(um) |
Y
(um) |
X
(um) |
Y
(um) |
| 1 |
2005 |
2000 |
2055
|
2000 |
10 |
- |
| 2 |
10020
|
2000 |
10070
|
2000 |
40 |
- |
| 3 |
14030
|
2000 |
14080 |
2000 |
60 |
- |
| 4 |
14045 |
6000 |
14095 |
6000 |
90 |
- |
| 5 |
10015 |
10000 |
10065 |
10000 |
30 |
- |
| 6 |
14035 |
10000 |
14085 |
10000 |
70 |
- |
| 7 |
14013 |
14000 |
14038 |
14000 |
50 |
50 |
| 8 |
18125 |
18000 |
18375 |
18000 |
50 |
500 |
| 9 |
18000 |
6000 |
|
|
100 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
X, Y coordinates are relavant to lower left corner of each die.
* Site numbers proceed from left to right and down to up sturctures.
* Site 9 has 100% persent density, so there is only up area. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automated
High Quality Measurement Sampling Plan |
top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Locations
for High Quality Measurement Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Site
# |
Up
Area |
Down
Area |
Site
Density
(%) |
Pitch
(um) |
| X
(um) |
Y
(um) |
X
(um) |
Y
(um) |
| 1 |
2005 |
2000 |
2055 |
2000 |
10 |
- |
| 2 |
6010 |
2000 |
6060 |
2000 |
20 |
- |
| 3 |
10020 |
2000 |
10070 |
2000 |
40 |
- |
| 4 |
14030 |
2000 |
14080 |
2000 |
60 |
- |
| 5 |
18040 |
2000 |
18090 |
2000 |
80 |
- |
| 6 |
3015 |
7000 |
3065 |
7000 |
30 |
- |
| 7 |
7025 |
7000 |
7075 |
7000 |
50 |
- |
| 8 |
11035 |
7000 |
11085 |
7000 |
70 |
- |
| 9 |
14045 |
6000 |
14095 |
6000 |
90 |
- |
| 10 |
2005 |
10000 |
2055 |
10000 |
10 |
- |
| 11 |
6045 |
10000 |
6095 |
10000 |
90 |
- |
| 12 |
10015 |
10000 |
10065 |
10000 |
30 |
- |
| 13 |
14035 |
10000 |
10065 |
10000 |
70 |
- |
| 14 |
18025 |
10000 |
18075 |
10000 |
50 |
- |
| 15 |
10002.5 |
14000 |
10007.5 |
14000 |
50 |
10 |
| 16 |
14012.5 |
14000 |
14037.5 |
14000 |
50 |
50 |
| 17 |
18025 |
14000 |
18075 |
14000 |
50 |
100 |
| 18 |
2005 |
18000 |
2015 |
18000 |
50 |
20 |
| 19 |
6020 |
18000 |
6060 |
18000 |
50 |
80 |
| 20 |
10007.5 |
18000 |
10022.5 |
18000 |
50 |
30 |
| 21 |
14050 |
18000 |
14150 |
18000 |
50 |
200 |
| 22 |
18125 |
18000 |
18375 |
18000 |
50 |
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PL(Planarization
Length) Dedicated Plan |
top |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Site
# |
Up
Area |
Down
Area |
Site
Density
(%) |
Pitch
(um) |
| X
(um) |
Y
(um) |
X
(um) |
Y
(um) |
| 1 |
2005 |
2000 |
2055
|
2000 |
10 |
- |
| 2 |
10020
|
2000 |
10070
|
2000 |
40 |
- |
| 3 |
14030
|
2000 |
14080 |
2000 |
60 |
- |
| 4 |
14045 |
6000 |
14095 |
6000 |
90 |
- |
| 5 |
8515 |
10000 |
8565 |
10000 |
30 |
- |
| 6 |
10015 |
10000 |
10065 |
10000 |
30 |
- |
| 7 |
11515 |
10000 |
11565 |
10000 |
30 |
- |
| 8 |
12535 |
10000 |
12585 |
10000 |
70 |
- |
| 9 |
14035 |
10000 |
14085 |
10000 |
70 |
- |
| 10 |
15535 |
10000 |
15585 |
10000 |
70 |
- |
| 11 |
14013 |
14000 |
14038 |
14000 |
50 |
50 |
| 12 |
18125 |
18000 |
18375 |
18000 |
50 |
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
Guide for Step Height Measurement |
top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Step height measurements are taken at the locations
shown in the figure below.
Because of the low throughput and significant manual effort involved,
step height measurements need only be taken at two die: one in the
center and one near the outside.
The variation in step height across the wafer is typically the largest
source of variation. Our specification for this is 5% or less.
For each of these die, the step height measurement is taken at four
density locations: 10%, 50%, 70% and 90% density locations.
SKW has verified via SEM measurements on many lots that the variation
in step height within a single die is less than 2%. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|